A common argument in product liability cases is that the manufacturer, distributor and/or retailer failed to provide adequate warning to the consumer. In response, these companies sometimes utilize the sophisticated user defense (also known as the learned intermediary doctrine) to try and protect themselves from liability.
The sophisticated user defense argues that a company didn’t have a duty to warn the user because the user was already aware of the product’s risks. In other words, if a plaintiff had sophisticated knowledge of the product, they should’ve noticed the defect or realized risks not clearly stated in accompanying safety instructions and thus couldn’t have been reasonably injured.
A sophisticated user is typically defined as someone who:
Yes. If the manufacturer, distributor or retailer can successfully prove that you had sophisticated knowledge of the product, it may limit their liability, weakening your chances of securing adequate compensation for your damages.
The experienced defective product attorneys at the Buckeye Law Group have strategized with clients facing this defense before and will gather evidence that protects your case against it and any other tactics. We’ll compile everything from your medical records, consumer expectation tests, prior complaints or recalls issued by the company and eyewitness testimony if available to bolster your chances of maximizing your potential compensation.
Product Design Defect: A defective product poses a danger to every user, even experienced ones. Inherently unsafe products can make the sophisticated user defense irrelevant.
Failure to Warn: Even if you were a sophisticated user, the manufacturer, distributor and retailer all still have a duty of care to provide a proper warning addressing their product’s risks for their users’ safety. If someone else – sophisticated user or not – could have reasonably been similarly injured due to the lack of warning, the sophisticated user defense may fall flat.
Hidden Hazards: If the defect that caused your injuries wasn’t obvious or was hidden, it may not have been obvious even to an experienced user, which means that the company had an obligation to disclose it.
Misrepresentation: A sophisticated user would have been reasonably injured if the risk level of the product was concealed through insufficient warnings that created a dangerous misunderstanding.
Industry Standard: We can use examples of other companies with similar products with adequate warnings for sophisticated and unsophisticated users to highlight how their product fell short of industry best practices and consumer expectations.
Reliable Narrative: In certain cases, as the first step in the production chain, the manufacturer may claim that it was the distributor or retailer’s obligation to warn, reducing their liability and limiting your compensation. However, depending on the specifics of your case, all three parties may be responsible if a product was sold without an appropriate warning.
Strict Liability: If strict liability applies, a defective product would make the company automatically liable, regardless of the user’s level of sophistication.
At the Buckeye Law Group, we’ll build a compelling case and zealously advocate for your rights as a consumer. Our attorneys have represented hundreds of Ohio plaintiffs hurt by defective products and will utilize that experience to increase your chances of securing the best possible outcome for your case.
Level the playing field with large corporations with a zealous team of defective product lawyers behind you. Call (216) 343-5710 or fill out our contact form to schedule a free case consultation with one of our defective product lawyers today.
Understanding Delayed Discovery With Surgical Malpractice Surgical errors are not always immediately obvious. Symptoms may appear days or weeks after a procedure. Unexpected pain, infections, or other complications can indicate
Why Medical Malpractice Cases Rely on Accurate Records Medical malpractice claims depend heavily on documentation. Accurate records are essential to establish whether proper standards of care were followed. When records
Why Bus Accident Claims Are More Complex A bus accident often involves multiple parties and unique legal rules. Unlike standard car crashes, these incidents may include public transit authorities, private
Why an Auto Accident Injury Attorney Matters in Hit‑and‑Run Cases Being injured by a hit‑and‑run driver adds an extra layer of stress to an already traumatic situation. When the at‑fault
Why a Wrongful Death Attorney Is Critical in Ohio The loss of a loved one due to someone else’s negligence is one of life’s most difficult challenges. A wrongful death
Why You Should Take Multitasking Behind the Wheel Seriously Multitasking while driving is more dangerous than many people realize. Eating, adjusting the GPS, or quickly checking a phone might seem
Why a Pedestrian Accident Attorney Is Important After an Injury Pedestrian accidents can lead to serious injuries, and navigating the legal process can be overwhelming without guidance. Working with a
Why Your Accident Lawyer Cares About Your Online Activity Social media is part of everyday life, but after an accident, what you post online can have serious consequences for your
Understanding Wrongful Death Claims Involving Commercial Trucks Losing a loved one in a trucking accident is one of the most devastating events a family can experience. Alongside overwhelming grief, families
Why Evidence Is Critical in Truck Accident Claims Truck accident cases are far more complex than standard car crashes, largely because of the amount of technical evidence involved. When a