A common argument in product liability cases is that the manufacturer, distributor and/or retailer failed to provide adequate warning to the consumer. In response, these companies sometimes utilize the sophisticated user defense (also known as the learned intermediary doctrine) to try and protect themselves from liability.
The sophisticated user defense argues that a company didn’t have a duty to warn the user because the user was already aware of the product’s risks. In other words, if a plaintiff had sophisticated knowledge of the product, they should’ve noticed the defect or realized risks not clearly stated in accompanying safety instructions and thus couldn’t have been reasonably injured.
A sophisticated user is typically defined as someone who:
Yes. If the manufacturer, distributor or retailer can successfully prove that you had sophisticated knowledge of the product, it may limit their liability, weakening your chances of securing adequate compensation for your damages.
The experienced defective product attorneys at the Buckeye Law Group have strategized with clients facing this defense before and will gather evidence that protects your case against it and any other tactics. We’ll compile everything from your medical records, consumer expectation tests, prior complaints or recalls issued by the company and eyewitness testimony if available to bolster your chances of maximizing your potential compensation.
Product Design Defect: A defective product poses a danger to every user, even experienced ones. Inherently unsafe products can make the sophisticated user defense irrelevant.
Failure to Warn: Even if you were a sophisticated user, the manufacturer, distributor and retailer all still have a duty of care to provide a proper warning addressing their product’s risks for their users’ safety. If someone else – sophisticated user or not – could have reasonably been similarly injured due to the lack of warning, the sophisticated user defense may fall flat.
Hidden Hazards: If the defect that caused your injuries wasn’t obvious or was hidden, it may not have been obvious even to an experienced user, which means that the company had an obligation to disclose it.
Misrepresentation: A sophisticated user would have been reasonably injured if the risk level of the product was concealed through insufficient warnings that created a dangerous misunderstanding.
Industry Standard: We can use examples of other companies with similar products with adequate warnings for sophisticated and unsophisticated users to highlight how their product fell short of industry best practices and consumer expectations.
Reliable Narrative: In certain cases, as the first step in the production chain, the manufacturer may claim that it was the distributor or retailer’s obligation to warn, reducing their liability and limiting your compensation. However, depending on the specifics of your case, all three parties may be responsible if a product was sold without an appropriate warning.
Strict Liability: If strict liability applies, a defective product would make the company automatically liable, regardless of the user’s level of sophistication.
At the Buckeye Law Group, we’ll build a compelling case and zealously advocate for your rights as a consumer. Our attorneys have represented hundreds of Ohio plaintiffs hurt by defective products and will utilize that experience to increase your chances of securing the best possible outcome for your case.
Level the playing field with large corporations with a zealous team of defective product lawyers behind you. Call (216) 343-5710 or fill out our contact form to schedule a free case consultation with one of our defective product lawyers today.
In 2021, attorney Gregory E. Gudin handled a case involving USAA, one of the nation’s most recognized insurance companies, that resulted in a $12 million settlement. This significant result is
Gregory E. Gudin has spent his legal career representing individuals whose cases involve serious financial consequences. Among the significant settlements on his professional portfolio is a $14.5 million settlement involving
The wrongful death of a loved one can leave a family facing significant emotional and financial hardships, particularly when the loss results from another party’s negligence. Under Ohio law, surviving
A Toledo Uber accident can feel more confusing than a typical car crash because several insurance policies may be involved. The most important issue is usually the driver’s app status
In Ohio, renters insurance may cover dog bite claims through the policy’s personal liability section, but coverage depends on the policy language, the dog’s history, and any exclusions. Cleveland renters
A crash with an uninsured or underinsured driver can turn an ordinary Dayton commute into a confusing insurance problem. Uninsured motorist coverage helps protect you when the at-fault driver has
Whiplash is one of the most common neck injuries people worry about after a car accident, especially after a rear-end collision. For Cleveland drivers, the challenge is that auto accident
Ohio requires drivers to prove financial responsibility, but that does not mean every driver on I-90, I-71, or a Cleveland surface street has enough insurance to pay for the harm
Rear-end crashes can look simple from the outside, but fault still depends on what each driver did, what the road conditions were, and what the evidence shows. In Columbus, Ohio,
A slip-and-fall injury claim in Cincinnati, Ohio, usually turns on proof: what caused the fall, who controlled the property, what the owner or occupier knew or should have known, and